[Python-Dev] Language Summit Follow-Up
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Thu May 29 18:30:14 CEST 2014
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu May 29 18:30:14 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Language Summit Follow-Up
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Language Summit Follow-Up
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 5/28/2014 6:26 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote: > I hope it's > not controversial to say that most new Python code is still being > written against Python 2.7 today; Given that Python 3 downloads now outnumber Python 2 downloads, I think 'most' might be an overstatement. But I think it a moot point. > if people are writing that code in such a way that it's not > 3-friendly, it should be a more immediately noticeable issue. If the truth were, conservatively, 1/4 of new Python code in 2.7, or even less, I would still be in favor of making 3-friendly 2.7 code easier. This is also important for the separate codebase approach, as in the stdlib. Just last week, I got a rejected chunk when backporting because a 2.7 idlelib module uses 'file(...' instead of 'open(...'. -- Terry Jan Reedy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Language Summit Follow-Up
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Language Summit Follow-Up
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list