Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Sat May 31 05:38:14 CEST 2014

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Language Summit Follow-Up
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Language Summit Follow-Up
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

> I already have too many other things on my todo list to work this up into
> a full PEP, but the proof of concept (along with IPython's existing
> support) shows there's no *technical* barrier to adding the feature.
>

That doesn't follow. A PoC and even IPython can ignore all kinds of
*technical* issues (e.g. giving code that's valid today a different
meaning). Please drop this idea or at least take it out of this thread and
focus on what *can* and *should* be done, in particular adding warnings
with good hints about what went wrong when Python 3 encounters what appears
to be a print statement.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140530/23879861/attachment-0001.html>

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Language Summit Follow-Up
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Language Summit Follow-Up
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list