[Python-Dev] PEP-498: Literal String Formatting
Alexander Walters
tritium-list at sdamon.com
Sat Aug 8 17:16:44 CEST 2015
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Aug 8 17:16:44 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP-498: Literal String Formatting
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP-498: Literal String Formatting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wait a second, the pep itself does not use the vestigial u''... it uses i''. where did u'' come from? On 8/8/2015 11:07, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 9 August 2015 at 00:05, Alexander Walters <tritium-list at sdamon.com> wrote: >> Please do not change the meaning of the vestigial U''. It was re-added to >> the language to fix a problem, rebinding it to another meaning introduces >> new problems. We have plenty of other letters in the alphabet to use. > It's actually being used in the same sense we already use it - I'm > just adding a new compile time use case where the distinction matters > again, which we haven't previously had in Python 3. (The usage in this > PEP is fairly closely analogous to WSGI's distinction between native > strings, text strings and binary strings, which matters for hybrid > Python 2/3 code, but not for pure Python 3 code) > > It would certainly be *possible* to use a different character for that > aspect of the PEP, but it would be additional work without any obvious > gain. > > Cheers, > Nick. > > P.S. I hop on the plane for the US in a few hours, so I'll be aiming > to be bad at responding to emails until the 17th or so. We'll see how > well I stick to that plan :) >
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP-498: Literal String Formatting
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP-498: Literal String Formatting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list