Home Original page

[Python-Dev] provisional status for asyncio

Guido van Rossum gvanrossum at gmail.com
Sat Aug 29 19:58:18 CEST 2015 
I don't want to remove asyncio from the stdlib. Another cycle of
provisional status is fine.

--Guido (on mobile)
On Aug 29, 2015 10:38 AM, "Larry Hastings" <larry at hastings.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 08/28/2015 08:44 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 at 08:35 Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, separating it from the standard library is something
>> that I don't think we can do so late in the 3.5 release candidates
>> process.
>>
>
> Ultimately it's Larry's call, but I don't see why we couldn't. If we were
> talking about something as low-level as the urllib package then I would
> agree, but beyond its own tests is there anything in the stdlib that
> depends on asyncio?
>
>
> I'm flexible here.  My concern is shipping high-quality software.
> Removing an entire package outright, even at such a late date, is pretty
> low-risk.  But before I'd allow it, you'd have to get a BDFL pronouncement
> (or BDFL-delegate pronouncement).
>
>
> */arry*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150829/15318378/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list