Home Original page

[Python-Dev] Obtaining stack-frames from co-routine objects

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sun Jun 14 13:20:04 CEST 2015 
On 14 Jun 2015 19:17, "Guido van Rossum" <guido at python.org> wrote:
>
> A good plan. I think this could be added to 3.5 still? It's a pretty
minor adjustment to the PEP 492 machinery, really.

Good point - as per Ben's original post, the lack of it makes it quite hard
to get a clear picture of the system state when using coroutines in the
current beta.

Cheers,
Nick.

>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 14 Jun 2015 10:01, "Ben Leslie" <benno at benno.id.au> wrote:
>> >
>> > If this seems like a good approach I'll try and work it in to a
>> > suitable patch for contribution.
>>
>> I think it's a good approach, and worth opening an enhancement issue for.
>>
>> I expect any patch would need some adjustments after Yury has finished
revising the async/await implementation to address some beta compatibility
issues with functools.singledispatch and Tornado.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nick.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Python-Dev mailing list
>> Python-Dev at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
>> Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150614/2c6527bc/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list