Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Tue Jun 23 00:10:04 CEST 2015

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 490: Chain exceptions at C level
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 490: Chain exceptions at C level
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 23 Jun 2015 04:12, "Ethan Furman" <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote:
>
> -1 on auto-chaining.
>
> +1 on chaining helper functions so it's dirt-simple.

Chiming in again since I wasn't clear on this aspect last time: I'd also be
+1 on parallel APIs that handle the chaining.

Since the auto-chaining idea seems largely unpopular, that suggests to me
that a parallel set of APIs would be the most readily accepted way forward.

I nominate a "*Chained" suffix as my suggested colour for the bikeshed :)

Cheers,
Nick.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150623/a288fa28/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 490: Chain exceptions at C level
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 490: Chain exceptions at C level
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list