[Python-Dev] Importance of "async" keyword
Ethan Furman
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Fri Jun 26 19:40:37 CEST 2015
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Jun 26 19:40:37 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Importance of "async" keyword
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Importance of "async" keyword
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 06/26/2015 08:47 AM, Steve Dower wrote: > On 06/26/2015 06:48 AM, Sven R. Kunze wrote: > >> def business(): >> return complex_calc(5) >> >> def business_new() >> return await complex_calc(10) > Assuming "async def business_new" (to avoid the syntax error), there's no difference between those functions or the one they're calling: > > * "complex_calc" returns an awaitable object that, after you've awaited it, will result in an int. > * "business" returns the return value of "complex_calc", which is an awaitable object that, after you've awaited it, will result in an int. > * "business_new" returns an awaitable object that, after you've awaited it, will result in an int. > > In all three of these cases, the result is the same. The fact that the awaitable object returned from any of them is implemented by a coroutine isn't important (in the same way that an iterable object may be implemented by a generator, but it's really irrelevant). What? Shouldn't 'business_new' return the int? It did await, after all. -- ~Ethan~
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Importance of "async" keyword
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Importance of "async" keyword
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list