[Python-Dev] PEP 485 review (isclose())
Brett Cannon
brett at python.org
Wed Mar 4 21:23:24 CET 2015
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Mar 4 21:23:24 CET 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 485 review (isclose())
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 485 review (isclose())
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:14 PM Chris Barker <chris.barker at noaa.gov> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: > >> On 03/03/2015 01:17 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: >> > > >> > Maybe it's time to rename the math module to _math and create a >> > math.py module, like _decimal/decimal? math.py should end with "from >> > _math import *". >> >> +1 >> > > What do folks think? If we're going to do this, I'll write isclose() in > python. And I could do the work to split it out, too, I suppose. > My vote -- as always -- is to do it in Python. If someone is sufficiently motivated to re-implement in C then that's great, but I don't think it should be required to be in C. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150304/d2643082/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 485 review (isclose())
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 485 review (isclose())
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list