Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Thu Mar 5 01:24:39 CET 2015

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 485 review (isclose())
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Any volunteers to implement PEP 479?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Ping? Anyone? http://bugs.python.org/issue22906

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> > There's a proof of concept patch in http://bugs.python.org/issue22906,
> but
> > it doesn't have the __future__ import and probably gets other details
> wrong.
> >
> > Reference:
> > PEP 479 -- Change StopIteration handling inside generators
> >
> > --
> > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
>
> For the benefit of people who haven't been following the tracker
> issue: There is now a patch which *does* create the __future__
> directive and so on. It applies cleanly to current tip (I just tested
> it again today), and the test suite passes on Debian AMD64. Can other
> people please try this, on other platforms, and see how it goes?
>
> ChrisA
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>



-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150304/57d420cc/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 485 review (isclose())
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Any volunteers to implement PEP 479?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list