[Python-Dev] PEP 489: Redesigning extension module loading
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Wed Mar 18 16:01:14 CET 2015
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Mar 18 16:01:14 CET 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 489: Redesigning extension module loading
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Possible wrong behavior of the dict?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 18 March 2015 at 06:41, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On 16/03/2015 12:38, Petr Viktorin wrote: >> >> Hello, > > > Can you use anything from the meta issue http://bugs.python.org/issue15787 > for PEP 3121 and PEP 384 or will the work that you are doing render > everything done previously redundant? Nothing should break in relation to PEP 3121 or 384, so I think that determination would still need to be made on a case by case basis. Alternatively, it may be possible to update the abitype.py converter to also switch to the new module initialisation hooks (if we can figure out a good way of automating that). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 489: Redesigning extension module loading
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Possible wrong behavior of the dict?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list