Home Original page

[Python-Dev] Needed reviews

Serhiy Storchaka storchaka at gmail.com
Sun Mar 22 10:20:13 CET 2015 
On 21.03.15 13:46, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 19 March 2015 at 19:28, Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Here is list of my ready for review patches.  It is incomplete and contains
>> only patches for which I don't expect objections or long discussion.  Most
>> of them are relative easy and need only formal review.  Most of them wait
>> for a review many months.
>
> It's worth noting that If there are changes you feel are genuinely low
> risk, you can go ahead and merge them based on your own commit review
> (even if you also wrote the original patch).

Yes, but four eyes are better than two eyes. I make mistakes. In some 
issues I hesitate about documentation part. In some issues (issue14260 
and issue22721) I provided two alternative solutions and need a tip to 
choose from them. While I am mainly sure about the correctness of the 
patch, I'm often hesitate about the direction. Is the bug worth fixing? 
Is the new feature worth to be added to Python?

Thanks Alexander, Amaury, Benjamin, Berker, Demian, Éric, Ethan, Martin, 
Paul, Victor and others that responded on my request.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list