[Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Fri May 1 07:58:55 CEST 2015
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri May 1 07:58:55 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Unicode literals in Python 2.7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nathaniel Smith wrote: > If await acted like -, then this would be > await (x ** 2) > But with the proposed grammar, it's instead > (await x) ** 2 Ah, I had missed that! This is a *good* argument for Yuri's grammar. I withdraw my objection now. -- Greg
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Unicode literals in Python 2.7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list