Stefan Behnel stefan_ml at behnel.de
Fri May 1 14:50:19 CEST 2015

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] ABCs - Re: PEP 492: async/await in Python; version 4
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: async/await in Python; version 4
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Yury Selivanov schrieb am 30.04.2015 um 03:30:
> 1. Terminology:
> - *native coroutine* term is used for "async def" functions.

When I read "native", I think of native (binary) code. So "native
coroutine" sounds like it's implemented in some compiled low-level
language. That might be the case (certainly in the CPython world), but it's
not related to this PEP nor its set of examples.


> We should discuss how we will name new 'async def' coroutines in
> Python Documentation if the PEP is accepted.

Well, it doesn't hurt to avoid obvious misleading terminology upfront.

Stefan

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] ABCs - Re: PEP 492: async/await in Python; version 4
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: async/await in Python; version 4
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list