[Python-Dev] PEP 492 quibble and request
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Fri May 1 21:59:41 CEST 2015
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri May 1 21:59:41 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 quibble and request
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 quibble and request
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Ron Adam <ron3200 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Another useful async function might be... > > async def yielding(): > pass > > In a routine is taking very long time, just inserting "await yielding()" > in the long calculation would let other awaitables run. > > That's really up to the scheduler, and a function like this should be provided by the event loop or scheduler framework you're using. > > If the async loop only has one coroutine (awaitable) in it, then it will > be just like calling a regular function. No waiting would occur. > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150501/a3cc40c7/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 quibble and request
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 quibble and request
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list