[Python-Dev] PEP 492: async/await in Python; version 4
Nathaniel Smith
njs at pobox.com
Wed May 6 00:01:05 CEST 2015
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed May 6 00:01:05 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: async/await in Python; version 4
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: async/await in Python; version 4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On May 5, 2015 2:14 PM, "Guido van Rossum" <guido at python.org> wrote: > > In the PEP 492 world, these concepts map as follows: > > - Future translates to "something with an __await__ method" (and asyncio Futures are trivially made compliant by defining Future.__await__ as an alias for Future.__iter__); > > - "asyncio coroutine" maps to "PEP 492 coroutine object" (either defined with `async def` or a generator decorated with @types.coroutine -- note that @asyncio.coroutine incorporates the latter); > > - "either of the above" maps to "awaitable". Err, aren't the first and third definitions above identical? Surely we want to say: an async def function is a convenient shorthand for creating a custom awaitable (exactly like how generators are a convenient shorthand for creating custom iterators), and a Future is-an awaitable that also adds some extra methods. -n -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150505/07e64950/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: async/await in Python; version 4
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: async/await in Python; version 4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list