[Python-Dev] Unicode literals in Python 2.7
Glenn Linderman
v+python at g.nevcal.com
Mon May 11 22:38:29 CEST 2015
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon May 11 22:38:29 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Unicode literals in Python 2.7
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Unicode literals in Python 2.7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 5/11/2015 1:09 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 10 May 2015 at 23:28, Adam Bartoš <drekin at gmail.com> wrote: >> Glenn Linderman wrote: >>> Is this going to get released in 3.5, I hope? Python 3 is pretty >>> limited without some solution for Unicode on the console... probably the >>> biggest deficiency I have found in Python 3, since its introduction. It >>> has great Unicode support for files and processing, which convinced me >>> to switch from Perl, and I like so much else about it, that I can hardly >>> code in Perl any more (I still support a few Perl programs, but have >>> ported most of them to Python). >> I'd love to see it included in 3.5, but I doubt that will happen. For one >> thing, it's only two weeks till beta 1, which is feature freeze. And mainly, >> my package is mostly hacking into existing Python environment. A proper >> implementation would need some changes in Python someone would have to do. >> See for example my proposal http://bugs.python.org/issue17620#msg234439. I'm >> not competent to write a patch myself and I have also no feedback to the >> proposed idea. On the other hand, using the package is good enough for me so >> I didn't further bring attention to the proposal. > Right, and while I'm interested in seeing this improved, I'm not > especially familiar with the internal details of our terminal > interaction implementation, and even less so when it comes to the > Windows terminal. Steve Dower's also had his hands full working on the > Windows installer changes, and several of our other Windows folks > aren't C programmers. > > PEP 432 (the interpreter startup sequence improvements) will be back > on the agenda for Python 3.6, so the 3.6 time frame seems more > plausible at this point. > > Cheers, > Nick. > Wow! Another bug that'll reach a decade in age before being fixed... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150511/bc35d062/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Unicode literals in Python 2.7
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Unicode literals in Python 2.7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list