[Python-Dev] Python-versus-CPython question for __mul__ dispatch
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat May 16 10:16:37 CEST 2015
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat May 16 10:16:37 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python-versus-CPython question for __mul__ dispatch
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python-versus-CPython question for __mul__ dispatch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 15 May 2015 at 16:53, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: >> I expect you can make something that behaves like list by defining __mul__ >> and __rmul__ and returning NotImplemented. > > Hmm, it's fairly tricky, and part of the trick is that you can never > return NotImplemented (because you have to pretty much take over and > entirely replace the normal dispatch rules inside __mul__ and > __rmul__), but see attached for something I think should work. > > So I guess this is just how Python's list, tuple, etc. work, and PyPy > and friends need to match... No, CPython is broken. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python-versus-CPython question for __mul__ dispatch
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python-versus-CPython question for __mul__ dispatch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list