[Python-Dev] Python-versus-CPython question for __mul__ dispatch
Armin Rigo
arigo at tunes.org
Tue May 19 16:00:54 CEST 2015
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue May 19 16:00:54 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python-versus-CPython question for __mul__ dispatch
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python-versus-CPython question for __mul__ dispatch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Nick, On 16 May 2015 at 10:31, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, that's rather annoying that the PyPy team implemented bug-for-bug > compatibility there, and didn't follow up on the operand precedence > bug report to say that they had done so. It's sadly not the only place, by far, where a behavior of CPython could be considered an implementation detail, but people rely on it and so we need to write a workaround. We don't report all of them, particularly not the ones that are clearly of the kind "won't be changed in CPython 2.7". Maybe we should? Another example where this same bug occurs is: class T(tuple): def __radd__(self, other): return 42 lst = [ ] lst += T() which calls T.__radd__ in contradiction to all the general rules. (Yes, if you print(lst) afterwards, you get 42. And oops, trying this out on PyPy does not give 42; only "lst + T()" does. Probably another corner case to fix...) A bientôt, Armin.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python-versus-CPython question for __mul__ dispatch
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python-versus-CPython question for __mul__ dispatch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list