[Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 489 (Multi-phase extension module initialization)
Raymond Hettinger
raymond.hettinger at gmail.com
Sat May 23 01:18:04 CEST 2015
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat May 23 01:18:04 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 489 (Multi-phase extension module initialization)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 489 (Multi-phase extension module initialization)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> On May 22, 2015, at 2:52 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > Congrats! Many thanks to all who contributed. > > On May 22, 2015 2:45 PM, "Eric Snow" <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > After extended discussion over the last several months on import-sig, > the resulting proposal for multi-phase (PEP 451) extension module > initialization has finalized. The resulting PEP provides a clean, > straight-forward, and backward-compatible way to import extension > modules using ModuleSpecs. > > With that in mind and given the improvement it provides, PEP 489 is > now accepted. I echo that sentiment. Thank you for your work. Raymond
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 489 (Multi-phase extension module initialization)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 489 (Multi-phase extension module initialization)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list