[Python-Dev] Preserving the definition order of class namespaces.
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Sun May 24 07:32:27 CEST 2015
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun May 24 07:32:27 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Preserving the definition order of class namespaces.
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Preserving the definition order of class namespaces.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
But isn't that also a problem? It would make the existence of that member a bit unpredictable. On Saturday, May 23, 2015, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote: > > > On 05/23/2015 09:46 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > How will __definition_order__ be set in the case where __prepare__ doesn't > return an OrderedDict? Or where a custom metaclass's __new__ calls its > superclass's __new__ with a plain dict? (I just wrote some code that does > that. :-) > > > In his patch, type_new tests to see if the dict passed in is an ordered > dict (PyODict_Check). __definition_order__ is only created and populated > if it passes the test. > > http://bugs.python.org/file39446/odict-class-definition-namespace.diff > > > */arry* > -- --Guido van Rossum (on iPad) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150523/73652ffc/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Preserving the definition order of class namespaces.
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Preserving the definition order of class namespaces.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list