[Python-Dev] PEP 0484 - the Numeric Tower
Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.barker at noaa.gov
Wed Oct 14 11:47:57 EDT 2015
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Oct 14 11:47:57 EDT 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 0484 - the Numeric Tower
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 0484 - the Numeric Tower
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> Well, that's what you get in exchange for "type safety". > > AIUI, the point of type annotations is that some use cases benefit *a > lot* from machine-parsable type information, not that type annotation > is a universally good idea in itself. It's not type *safety* that's > the aim here. It's type *auditability*. If it were about "safety", > annotations would be in the interpreter, not in a separate, optional > application. Well, what's the point if you don't use it? I'm probably being paranoid here, but I can envision institutions that enforce running the type checker for any committed code, etc... And then for practical purposes, it's enforced on that project. >> Which is exactly why I'm concerned about widespread use of type >> annotations. Might as well use a static language :-( > > No, no way would this satisfy static typing advocates. Optional, > remember? Notice that I said "widespread" -- and again, paranoia: it'll always be optional in Python itself, but it may not be optional in some institutions/code bases. > In Python, widespread use of type annotations that messes up Decimal > users would be un-Pythonic Well yes, that's my point :-) > you can't simply refuse to run the type checker, If you can simply refuse to run the type checker, then it makes me wonder what the point of the type checker is :-) Anyway, lots of folks think type annotations will be useful without constraining the language -- and now we have a standard way to do it -- so I guess we'll see how it plays out. -CHB > I will bet that > Guido himself will be your champion.[1] > > Footnotes: > [1] I'm not channeling anybody here, that's a statement of my > personal assessment of the real risk. And of course it may have no > effect on the developers who use type annotations in that way, but > this is no different from any other hard to work around programming > practice. > >
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 0484 - the Numeric Tower
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 0484 - the Numeric Tower
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list