[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Daily reference leaks (d7e490db8d54): sum=61494
Random832
random832 at fastmail.com
Wed Oct 21 11:53:45 EDT 2015
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Oct 21 11:53:45 EDT 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Daily reference leaks (d7e490db8d54): sum=61494
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Daily reference leaks (d7e490db8d54): sum=61494
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> writes: > Thanks for hunting this down. I had seen the automated reference leak > posts but didn't suspect that a pure python class would have caused > the leak. > > I'm re-opening > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-October/141993.html > and will take a look at it this weekend. If I don't see an obvious > fix, I'll revert Joe's patch until a correct patch is supplied and > reviewed. If a pure python class can cause a reference leak, doesn't that mean it is only a symptom rather than the real cause? Or is it that the use of @object.__new__ is considered "too clever" to be worth fixing?
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Daily reference leaks (d7e490db8d54): sum=61494
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Daily reference leaks (d7e490db8d54): sum=61494
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list