Eric V. Smith eric at trueblade.com
Thu Oct 22 08:27:41 EDT 2015

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 10/22/2015 7:32 AM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
> On 10/21/2015 10:57 PM, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
>> It mentions fr'...' as a formatted raw string but doesn't say anything
>> about rf'...'. Right now, in implementing PEP 498 support in Howl
>> (https://github.com/howl-editor/howl/pull/118 and
>> https://github.com/howl-editor/howl/commit/1e577da89efc1c1de780634b531f64346cf586d6#diff-851d9b84896270cc7e3bbea3014007a5R86),
>> I assumed both were valid. Should the PEP be more specific?
> 
> Yes, I'll add some wording.

Now that I check, in the Specification section, the PEP already says
"'f' may be combined with 'r', in either order, to produce raw f-string
literals". So I think this case is covered, no?

Eric.

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list