[Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
Ethan Furman
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Mon Oct 26 15:54:42 EDT 2015
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Oct 26 15:54:42 EDT 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 10/26/2015 11:45 AM, Sven R. Kunze wrote: > On 26.10.2015 16:22, Ethan Furman wrote: >> On 10/23/2015 08:20 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >>> My own objection isn't to allowing "fR" or "fbR", it's to allowing the >>> uppercase "F". >>> >>> I also don't understand why we can't say "if 'f' is part of a string >>> prefix, it must be first". >> >> Sometimes order matters, and sometimes it does not. If the order does >> not have an impact on the final code, it does not matter, and making >> us have to remember an order that does not matter is a waste. > > Order that matters? You must be kidding. You misunderstand -- the order of string prefixes does *not* matter, so forcing us to use one is silly. -- ~Ethan~
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list