Home Original page

[Python-Dev] Defining a path protocol

Wes Turner wes.turner at gmail.com
Wed Apr 6 22:24:19 EDT 2016 
On Apr 6, 2016 6:31 PM, "Brett Cannon" <brett at python.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 at 16:25 Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 at 15:22 Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> So I think we need a builtin.
>> >
>> >
>> > Well, the ugliness shouldn't survive forever if the community shifts
over to
>> > using pathlib while the built-in will. We also don't have a built-in
for
>> > __index__() so it depends on whether we expect this sort of thing to
be the
>> > purview of library authors or if normal people will be interacting
with it
>> > (it's probably both during the transition, but I don't know
afterwards).
>>
>> For __index__ the "built-in" is:
>>
>> from operator import index
>
>
> Which suggests perhaps we should have pathlib.fspath() instead of a
built-in.

Would it make sense to instead have pathlib.Path.__init__?

>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/wes.turner%40gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160406/c2e68bcf/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list