[Python-Dev] Defining a path protocol (was: When should pathlib stop being provisional?)
Victor Stinner
victor.stinner at gmail.com
Fri Apr 8 09:31:49 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Apr 8 09:31:49 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Defining a path protocol (was: When should pathlib stop being provisional?)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Defining a path protocol (was: When should pathlib stop being provisional?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Please write a new PEP. The topic looks to be discussed since many months by many different people on different mailing list. A PEP is a good standard to take a decision and it became clear that a decision must be taken for pathlib. Victor -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160408/7f35b128/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Defining a path protocol (was: When should pathlib stop being provisional?)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Defining a path protocol (was: When should pathlib stop being provisional?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list