Koos Zevenhoven k7hoven at gmail.com
Fri Apr 8 14:34:00 EDT 2016

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Pathlib enhancments - method name only
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Pathlib enhancments - method name only
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Chris Barker <chris.barker at noaa.gov> wrote:
>
> we rejected plain old __path__ because this is already ued in another
> context, but if we add "str" on the end, that's not longer an issue, so do
> we need the "fs"?
>
> __pathstr__ # pathstring
>

Or perhaps __pathstring__ in case it may be or return byte strings.

-Koos

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Pathlib enhancments - method name only
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Pathlib enhancments - method name only
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list