[Python-Dev] pathlib - current status of discussions
Alexander Walters
tritium-list at sdamon.com
Wed Apr 13 13:22:48 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Apr 13 13:22:48 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] pathlib - current status of discussions
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] pathlib - current status of discussions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4/13/2016 13:10, Brett Cannon wrote: > https://gist.github.com/brettcannon/b3719f54715787d54a206bc011869aa1 has > the four potential approaches implemented (although it doesn't follow > the "separate functions" approach some are proposing and instead goes > with the allow_bytes approach I originally proposed). Number 4 is my personal favorite - it has a simple control flow path and is the least needlessly restrictive. (I could rant about needless restrictions, but I am about a decade late for that, so I wont bother.)
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] pathlib - current status of discussions
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] pathlib - current status of discussions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list