[Python-Dev] Someons's put a "Python 2.8" on GitHub
David Mertz
mertz at gnosis.cx
Sat Dec 10 16:05:26 EST 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Dec 10 16:05:26 EST 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Someons's put a "Python 2.8" on GitHub
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Someons's put a "Python 2.8" on GitHub
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I am more worried about the confusion than Guido is. I agree that this will remain a toy project. But as someone who trains scientist to use Python and consults with large companies with large Python 2 codebases, I think the very existence of a thing called "Python 2.8" will serve as a pretext for managers to drag their feet further on migration plans... Ultimately hurting their own business, but that becomes harder to explain. On Dec 10, 2016 8:07 AM, "Guido van Rossum" <guido at python.org> wrote: While I think the name is misleading and in violation of PSF policy and/or license, I am not too worried about this. I expect it will be tough to port libraries from Python 3 reliably because it is not true Python 3 (e.g. str/bytes). So then it's just a toy. Who cares about having 'async def' if there's no backport of asyncio? -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ mertz%40gnosis.cx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20161210/3a6dc87a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Someons's put a "Python 2.8" on GitHub
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Someons's put a "Python 2.8" on GitHub
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list