[Python-Dev] PEP 515: Underscores in Numeric Literals
Glenn Linderman
v+python at g.nevcal.com
Thu Feb 11 14:04:20 EST 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Feb 11 14:04:20 EST 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 515: Underscores in Numeric Literals
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 515: Underscores in Numeric Literals
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2/11/2016 12:22 AM, Georg Brandl wrote: > Hey all, > > based on the feedback so far, I revised the PEP. There is now > a much simpler rule for allowed underscores, with no exceptions. > This made the grammar simpler as well. +1 overall > Examples:: > > # grouping decimal numbers by thousands > amount = 10_000_000.0 > > # grouping hexadecimal addresses by words > addr = 0xDEAD_BEEF > > # grouping bits into bytes in a binary literal nybbles, not bytes, is shown... which is more readable, and does group into bytes also. > flags = 0b_0011_1111_0100_1110 +1 on 0b_ and 0X_ and, especially, 0O_ (but why anyone would use uppercase base designators is beyond me, as it is definitely less readable) > # making the literal suffix stand out more > imag = 1.247812376e-15_j +1 on _j -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160211/533488f9/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 515: Underscores in Numeric Literals
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 515: Underscores in Numeric Literals
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list