[Python-Dev] Time for a change of random number generator?
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Thu Feb 11 22:19:15 EST 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Feb 11 22:19:15 EST 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Time for a change of random number generator?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Time for a change of random number generator?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Steven D'Aprano writes: > Peters has an opinion?) but if we do change, I'd like to see the > existing random.Random moved to random.MT_Random for backwards > compatibility and compatibility with other software which uses MT. Not > necessarily saying that we have to keep it around forever (after all, we > did dump the Wichmann-Hill PRNG some time ago) but we ought to keep it > for at least a couple of releases. I think we should keep it around forever. Even my slowest colleagues are learning that they should record their seeds and PRNG algorithms for reproducibility's sake. :-) For that matter, restore Wichmann-Hill. Both should be clearly marked as "use only for reproducing previous bitstreams" (eg, in a package random.deprecated_generators).
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Time for a change of random number generator?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Time for a change of random number generator?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list