[Python-Dev] FAT Python (lack of) performance
Chris Angelico
rosuav at gmail.com
Tue Jan 26 10:40:08 EST 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Jan 26 10:40:08 EST 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] FAT Python (lack of) performance
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] FAT Python (lack of) performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 2:28 AM, Ryan Gonzalez <rymg19 at gmail.com> wrote: >>rosuav at sikorsky:~$ gcc fib.c && time ./a.out >>1134903170 >> >>real 0m9.104s >>user 0m9.064s >>sys 0m0.000s >>rosuav at sikorsky:~$ cat fib.c >>#include <stdio.h> >> >>unsigned long fib(unsigned long n) >>{ >> if (n < 2) return n; >> return fib(n-2) + fib(n-1); >>} >> >>int main() >>{ >> printf("%lu\n",fib(45)); >>} >> > > *cough* -O3 *cough* > Oh, I'm sorry. Let's try it again. rosuav at sikorsky:~$ gcc -O3 fib.c && time ./a.out 1134903170 real 0m3.153s user 0m3.088s sys 0m0.052s Cool! Seems to be linear. From which we can deduce that Python on my system was compiled at about -O275. ChrisA
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] FAT Python (lack of) performance
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] FAT Python (lack of) performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list