[Python-Dev] Status of Python 3.6 PEPs?
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Tue Jul 12 21:57:59 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Jul 12 21:57:59 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Status of Python 3.6 PEPs?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Status of Python 3.6 PEPs?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12 July 2016 at 20:05, INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> "PEP 520 -- Preserving Class Attribute Definition Order" >> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0520/ >> => accepted -- what is the status of its implementation? >> I also see some discussions for even more compact dict implementation. > > Here is implementation of the compact dict preserving insertion order. > http://bugs.python.org/issue27350 > > I hope it is reviewed before merging PEP 520 implementation. Several of my review comments on the draft 520 implementation were aimed at ensuring the assumption of the use of ODict specifically were minimised, so the test, docs and implementation tweaks needed to adjust back to an insertion-ordered-by-default plain dict will be pretty minimal, even if the current 520 implementation lands first (which seems likely). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Status of Python 3.6 PEPs?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Status of Python 3.6 PEPs?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list