[Python-Dev] Improving the bytecode
Serhiy Storchaka
storchaka at gmail.com
Sat Jun 4 04:08:39 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Jun 4 04:08:39 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] C99
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Improving the bytecode
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Following the converting 8-bit bytecode to 16-bit bytecode (wordcode), there are other issues for improving the bytecode. 1. http://bugs.python.org/issue27129 Make the bytecode more 16-bit oriented. 2. http://bugs.python.org/issue27140 Add new opcode BUILD_CONST_KEY_MAP for building a dict with constant keys. This optimize the common case and especially helpful for two following issues (creating and calling functions). 3. http://bugs.python.org/issue27095 Simplify MAKE_FUNCTION/MAKE_CLOSURE. Instead packing three numbers in oparg the new MAKE_FUNCTION takes built tuples and dicts from the stack. MAKE_FUNCTION and MAKE_CLOSURE are merged in the single opcode. 4. http://bugs.python.org/issue27213 Rework CALL_FUNCTION* opcodes. Replace four existing opcodes with three simpler and more efficient opcodes. 5. http://bugs.python.org/issue27127 Rework the for loop implementation. 6. http://bugs.python.org/issue17611 Move unwinding of stack for "pseudo exceptions" from interpreter to compiler.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] C99
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Improving the bytecode
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list