[Python-Dev] PEP 467: Minor API improvements to bytes, bytearray, and memoryview
Brett Cannon
brett at python.org
Tue Jun 7 17:40:35 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Jun 7 17:40:35 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467: Minor API improvements to bytes, bytearray, and memoryview
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467: Minor API improvements to bytes, bytearray, and memoryview
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 at 14:38 Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:31:19 -0400 > Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > > > On Jun 07, 2016, at 01:28 PM, Ethan Furman wrote: > > > > >* Add ``bytes.iterbytes``, ``bytearray.iterbytes`` and > > > ``memoryview.iterbytes`` alternative iterators > > > > +1 but I want to go just a little farther. > > > > We can't change bytes.__getitem__ but we can add another method that > > returns single byte objects? I think it's still a bit of a pain to > > extract single bytes even with .iterbytes(). > > > > Maybe .iterbytes can take a single index argument (blech) or add a > > method like .byte_at(i). I'll let you bikeshed on the name. > > What's wrong with b[i:i+1] ? > It always succeeds while indexing can trigger an IndexError. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160607/d882821f/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467: Minor API improvements to bytes, bytearray, and memoryview
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467: Minor API improvements to bytes, bytearray, and memoryview
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list