[Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Fri Jun 10 16:11:59 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Jun 10 16:11:59 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jun 10, 2016, at 12:05 PM, David Mertz wrote: >OK. My understanding is that Guido ruled out introducing an os.getrandom() >API in 3.5.2. But would you be happy if that interface is added to 3.6? I would. >It feels to me like the correct spelling in 3.6 should probably be >secrets.getrandom() or something related to that. ISTM that secrets is a somewhat higher level API while it makes sense that a fairly simple plumbing of the underlying C call should go in os. But I wouldn't argue much if folks had strong opinions to the contrary. Cheers, -Barry
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list