[Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Thu Jun 16 10:04:43 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Jun 16 10:04:43 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jun 16, 2016, at 09:51 AM, Random832 wrote: >On Thu, Jun 16, 2016, at 04:03, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> *If* we can guarantee that os.urandom() will never block or raise an >> exception when only poor entropy is available, then it may be indeed >> indistinguishably backward compatible for most if not all cases. > >Why can't we exclude cases when only poor entropy is available from >"most if not all cases"? Because if it blocks or raises a new exception on poor entropy it's an API break. Cheers, -Barry
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list