[Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Thu Jun 16 16:09:40 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Jun 16 16:09:40 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jun 16, 2016, at 01:01 PM, David Mertz wrote: >It seems to me that backporting 'secrets' and putting it on Warehouse would >be a lot more productive than complaining about 3.5.2 reverting to (almost) >the behavior of 2.3-3.4. Very wise suggestion indeed. We have all kinds of stdlib modules backported and released as third party packages. Why not secrets too? If such were on PyPI, I'd happily package it up for the Debian ecosystem. Problem solved <wink>. But I'm *really* going to try to disengage from this discussion until Nick's PEP is posted. Cheers, -Barry
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list