[Python-Dev] PEP 487: Simpler customization of class creation
Eric Snow
ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com
Tue Jun 21 20:41:53 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Jun 21 20:41:53 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 487: Simpler customization of class creation
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 487: Simpler customization of class creation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > If we had had these semantics in the language from the start, there would have > been plenty uses of this order, and I suspect nobody would have considered > asking for __definition_order__. True. The key thing that __definition_order__ provides is an explicit relationship with the class definition. Since we have the opportunity to capture that now, I think we should take it, regardless of the type of the class definition namespace or even of cls.__dict__. For me the strong association with the order in the class definition is worth having. -eric
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 487: Simpler customization of class creation
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 487: Simpler customization of class creation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list