[Python-Dev] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor to PEP 467 (was: [Python-ideas] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor
Victor Stinner
victor.stinner at gmail.com
Wed Oct 12 12:42:01 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Oct 12 12:42:01 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor to PEP 467 (was: [Python-ideas] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor to PEP 467 (was: [Python-ideas] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Oops, right, I wanted to write "I don't think that adding a single method deserves its own PEP." Victor 2016-10-12 18:37 GMT+02:00 Stephen J. Turnbull <turnbull.stephen.fw at u.tsukuba.ac.jp>: > Victor Stinner writes: > > 2016-10-12 11:34 GMT+02:00 INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com>: > > > > I see. My proposal should be another PEP (if PEP is required). > > > > I don't think that adding a single method deserves its own method. > > You mean "deserves own PEP", right? I interpreted Nick to say that > "the reasons that applied to PEP 367 don't apply here, so you can Just > Do It" (subject to the usual criteria for review, but omit the PEP). > > I'm not sure whether he was channeling Guido or that should be > qualified with an IMO or IMHO. > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor to PEP 467 (was: [Python-ideas] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor to PEP 467 (was: [Python-ideas] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list