[Python-Dev] Please reject or postpone PEP 526
Koos Zevenhoven
k7hoven at gmail.com
Sun Sep 4 12:58:50 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Sep 4 12:58:50 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Please reject or postpone PEP 526
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Please reject or postpone PEP 526
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 4 September 2016 at 21:32, Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivskyi at gmail.com> wrote: >> The first form still could be interpreted by type checkers >> as annotation for value (a cast to more precise type): >> >> variable = cast(annotation, value) # visually also looks similar > > I think a function based spelling needs to be discussed further, as it > seems to me that at least some of the goals of the PEP could be met > with a suitable definition of "cast" and "declare", with no syntactic > changes to Python. Specifically, consider: > > def cast(value, annotation): > return value > typing.cast already exists. -- Koos
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Please reject or postpone PEP 526
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Please reject or postpone PEP 526
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list