[Python-Dev] PEP520 and absence of __definition_order__
Eric Snow
ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com
Sat Sep 10 14:52:51 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Sep 10 14:52:51 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP520 and absence of __definition_order__
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP520 and absence of __definition_order__
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sep 10, 2016 11:00, "Nick Coghlan" <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 11 September 2016 at 03:08, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > So I'm happy to continue thinking about this, but I expect this is not > > such a big deal as you fear. Anyway, let's see if someone comes up > > with a more convincing argument by beta 2! , > Nick. > > P.S. I'd actually love it if we could skip __definition_order__ - > there really is a whole lot of runtime clutter on class objects, and > we're adding __annotations__ as well. Unfortunately, I also think we > made the right call the first time around in thinking it would still > be necessary even if class namespaces became order preserving :) > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ericsnowcurrently%40gmail.com -eric (phone) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160910/d99b55d5/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP520 and absence of __definition_order__
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP520 and absence of __definition_order__
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list