[Python-Dev] PEP520 and absence of __definition_order__
Eric Snow
ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com
Sat Sep 10 15:02:29 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Sep 10 15:02:29 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP520 and absence of __definition_order__
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP520 and absence of __definition_order__
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sep 10, 2016 10:11, "Guido van Rossum" <guido at python.org> wrote: > > Thanks for bringing this up. I think it's definitely possible to argue > either way. I think what happened before was that I approved > __definition_order__ because I wasn't expecting dict to be ordered by > default. Now that Inada Naoki's patch has landed things have changed. > > Here's my reason for agreeing with (or convincing?) Eric to drop > __definition_order__, as I remember it from the (lively) discussion at > the sprint. > FWIW, my position was to leave __definition_order__ in place. However, once it became *mostly* redundant, I didn't consider the remaining benefits to be sufficient justification for the extra complexity in the code to the point that it was worth debating. So I didn't object very strenuously when Benjamin suggested removing it. Regardless, I'm still in favor of keeping __definition_order__. :) -eric (phone) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160910/5e3668b1/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP520 and absence of __definition_order__
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP520 and absence of __definition_order__
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list