[Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered
Paul Moore
p.f.moore at gmail.com
Wed Sep 14 08:29:53 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Sep 14 08:29:53 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 14 September 2016 at 13:18, Franklin? Lee <leewangzhong+python at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 9, 2016 1:35 AM, "Benjamin Peterson" <benjamin at python.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016, at 22:33, Tim Delaney wrote: >> > Are sets also ordered by default now? None of the PEPs appear to mention >> > it. >> >> No. > > Is there anyone working to move sets in the same direction for 3.6? It won't happen for 3.6, as we're now in feature freeze. So it'd be 3.7 at the earliest. What exactly do you mean by "in the same direction" anyway? Remember that ordering isn't guaranteed (it's an implementation detail), so are you just saying "can sets benefit from the improvements this change provided to dicts"? If you *are* hoping for ordered sets, what's your use case? (Dictionaries had particular use cases - retaining ordering of keyword arguments and class definitions, the existence of OrderedDict, ...) Paul
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list