[Python-Dev] iso8601 parsing
Mike Miller
python-dev at mgmiller.net
Thu Dec 7 22:38:00 EST 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Dec 7 22:38:00 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] iso8601 parsing
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] iso8601 parsing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guess the argument for limiting what it accepts would be that every funky variation will need to be supported until the endtimes, even those of little use or utility. On the other hand, it might be good to keep the two implementations the same for consistency reasons. Thanks either way, -Mike On 2017-12-07 17:57, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote:
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] iso8601 parsing
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] iso8601 parsing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list