[Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Sun Dec 17 11:22:53 EST 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Dec 17 11:22:53 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Julien Salort <listes at salort.eu> wrote: > Le 15/12/2017 à 22:14, Paul Moore a écrit : > > Annotations and the annotation syntax are fundamental to the design. >> But that's core Python syntax. But I wouldn't describe types as being >> that significant to the design, it's more "if you supply them we'll >> make use of them". >> > Naive question from a lurker: does it mean that it works also if one > annotates with something that is not a type, e.g. a comment, > > @dataclass > class C: > a: "This represents the amplitude" = 0.0 > b: "This is an offset" = 0.0 I would personally not use the notation for this, but it is legal code. However static type checkers like mypy won't be happy with this. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171217/3f0fa046/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list