[Python-Dev] Usefulness of binary compatibility accross Python versions?
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon Dec 18 05:23:31 EST 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Dec 18 05:23:31 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Usefulness of binary compatibility accross Python versions?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Usefulness of binary compatibility accross Python versions?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:07:02 -0500 Random832 <random832 at fastmail.com> wrote: > > Is there any practical for of having the flag off for one slot and on > for another slot that's been added later? > > Could this be replaced (that is, a slot for such a thing added before > it's too late) with a simple counter that goes up with each version, and > any "unused" slot should have NULL or some other sentinel value? Any replacement here would break binary compatibility, which is what those flags are precisely meant to avoid. > If it > really is important to have the flags themselves, just add another set > of flags - Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_MORE_FLAGS. Yes, we could... but it's more complication again. That said, if we decide to drop cross-version compatibility, we then are allowed to enlarge the tp_flags field to, say, 64 bits. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Usefulness of binary compatibility accross Python versions?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Usefulness of binary compatibility accross Python versions?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list