[Python-Dev] Decision of having a deprecation period or not for changing csv.DictReader returning type.
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Mon Dec 18 10:24:16 EST 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Dec 18 10:24:16 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Decision of having a deprecation period or not for changing csv.DictReader returning type.
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Decision of having a deprecation period or not for changing csv.DictReader returning type.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Let's not do this. Once it's documented as returning an OrderedDict there's an additional promise about the API, e.g. move_to_end() exists. On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:30 PM, 尚辉 <shangdahao at gmail.com> wrote: > Since regular dicts are ordered in 3.7, it might be cleaner to returning regular dict instead of OrderedDict? > > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171218/7fca3dc6/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Decision of having a deprecation period or not for changing csv.DictReader returning type.
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Decision of having a deprecation period or not for changing csv.DictReader returning type.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list