[Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?
Sven R. Kunze
srkunze at mail.de
Thu Dec 21 06:25:41 EST 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Dec 21 06:25:41 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 21.12.2017 11:22, Terry Reedy wrote: > >>> @dataclass >>> class C: >>> a: int # integer field with no default >>> b: float = 0.0 # float field with a default >>> >>> And the types will be recognized by type checkers such as mypy. >>> >>> And I think the non-typed examples should go first in the docs. > I still don't understand why "I don't care" can be defined by "leaving out" @dataclass class C: b = 0.0 # float field with a default For non-default fields, I like ellipsis too. Cheer, Sven -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171221/dcef0001/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list