[Python-Dev] Guarantee ordered dict literals in v3.7?
Stephen J. Turnbull
turnbull.stephen.fw at u.tsukuba.ac.jp
Thu Dec 21 22:51:36 EST 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Dec 21 22:51:36 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Guarantee ordered dict literals in v3.7?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Guarantee ordered dict literals in v3.7?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris Barker writes: > Nathaniel Smith has pointed out that eval(pprint(a_dict)) is > supposed to return the same dict -- so documented behavior may > already be broken. Sure, but that's because we put shoes on a snake. Why anybody expects no impediment to slithering, I don't know! I understand the motivation to guarantee order, but it's a programmer convenience that has nothing to do with the idea of mapping, and the particular (insertion) order is very special and usually neither relevant nor reproducible. I have no problem whatsoever with just documenting any failure to preserve order while reproducing dicts, *except* that a process that inserts keys in the same order had better result in the same insertion order. Steve
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Guarantee ordered dict literals in v3.7?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Guarantee ordered dict literals in v3.7?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list